{"id":2631,"date":"2023-07-07T10:38:24","date_gmt":"2023-07-07T01:38:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rageworx.info\/?p=2631"},"modified":"2023-07-07T10:59:14","modified_gmt":"2023-07-07T01:59:14","slug":"an-open-source-project-for-praticing-gia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rageworx.info\/?p=2631","title":{"rendered":"An open source project for praticing GIA."},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"

GIA practice for macOS w\/ Python<\/p><\/div>\n

While I am preparing for better result for GIA, found an open source project runs well on bare python and less-dependency-libraries requirements repo on here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And I have improved some parts of code to run modern macOS python as well for checking final result better on here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Anyone can download source code to anywhere, and prepare minimal requirements with homebrew<\/a> (recommends using homebrew and python with it), and this small wiki page may help<\/a> how to run this python app on macOS.<\/p>\n

Studying about GIA<\/h2>\n

I am not a native lingual for English, but GIA don’t support my native language even I have to test with it as like native English men. Specially, each part of testing has each different score system to analyzing what people is on testing.<\/p>\n

According to public sample of Thomas GIA report<\/a>, there’s something mechanism to analyzing talent who people in testing.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

How to be calculated \u201cPercentile ranking\u201d for 52\/53 to 93%, but just assuming it is depended on their gathered ranking.<\/p>\n

\u00a0High risk is \u201cReasoning\u201d and \u201cWord meaning\u201d<\/h4>\n

\u201cReasoning\u201d may test assuming to check Subject’s reading & memory to fast answering with different type of asking like this:<\/p>\n

Announcement : Jane is smaller than Thomas<\/p>\n

Question : Who is taller ?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And \u201cWord meaning\u201d is simply choose one for different one among of 3 short words like this:<\/p>\n

OUT, IN, PRIM<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It feels simply easy, but some cases are not to me like this:<\/p>\n

BEAUTIFUL, EAGER, ENTHUSIASTIC<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Two words except \u201cBeautiful\u201d meaning is not familiar to me to understand in really short time.
\nReasoning only has big minus points to wrong answer, each testing section has different scoring ratios:<\/p>\n